Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> wrote:

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

    palashbiswaskl.nandi@gmail.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or unnecessary spaces. Learn more at http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6596

----- Original message -----

Received: from mr.google.com ([10.142.61.19])
       by 10.142.61.19 with SMTP id j19mr583221wfa.201.1259990763834 (num_hops = 1);
       Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.61.19 with SMTP id j19mr467880wfa.201.1259990763817;
       Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:26:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-To: palashbiswaskl.nandi@gmail.com
X-Forwarded-For: palashbiswaskl@gmail.com palashbiswaskl.nandi@gmail.com
Delivered-To: palashbiswaskl@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.51.9 with SMTP id y9cs22293wfy;
       Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <feroze.moses777@gmail.com>
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of feroze.moses777@gmail.com designates 10.142.9.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.142.9.41;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of feroze.moses777@gmail.com designates 10.142.9.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=feroze.moses777@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=feroze.moses777@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.142.9.41])
       by 10.142.9.41 with SMTP id 41mr539855wfi.122.1259990763055 (num_hops = 1);
       Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:26:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
       d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
       h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
        :from:to:content-type;
       bh=EzCdLLenPUzAxfG+xffMtwsmlsZi99dcLHLUsCWrJIc=;
       b=qw8Iqe3osfSxMxgRta6ilZcWDijCK6corC7t7UozRkKhO/NLctxVECY3SSJEFZE4xh
        AJicvn2G0eLiFJJMzz/wBxf84S6JVVuN3h0aziIF52c2bA2p1s24W1SJ7AMPvrZoeTXT
        dRdMNvB3KvBveDWmr6oLvuydXCNvfRurUPBSE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
       d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
       h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
       b=M7sZv9RKVUG5PArrWhqUuVWC+r1gCCdpwV4YQMb1Fy5rE4QqCk+m6X6euYbYxDo4G7
        rXkby/bBX3tPEre0pmr9xuM6tulo9n2zoYcTQG3GEZeJpRfe+x0jMEUZg8jbmKU3BKTW
        +VUo2aQQjlm4sAi2wNYf+CidVXdOPESD/QP50=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.9.41 with SMTP id 41mr426395wfi.122.1259990763027; Fri, 04
       Dec 2009 21:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:56:03 +0530
Message-ID: <54720f500912042126k7233eaf7j3442b83fcdca4f39@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: 'No Afghanistan withdrawal in 2011': Gen James Jones
From: Feroze Mithiborwala <feroze.moses777@gmail.com>
To: peace-mumbai <peace-mumbai@googlegroups.com>,
       citizen-mumbai <citizen-mumbai@googlegroups.com>, grey-youth-movement@googlegroups.com,
       awami_bharat@googlegroups.com, Palash Biswas <palashbiswaskl@gmail.com>,
       MEDIA CELL <mediacell.jih@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502be42d9be570479f475fa

 *'No Afghanistan withdrawal in 2011': *

 Gen James Jones told me that "in no manner, shape or form" would the US
withdraw from Afghanistan in 2011. In his speech on Tuesday, President Obama
for the first time put a date on the beginning of the end of the United
States presence in Afghanistan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markmardell/2009/12/no_afghanistan_withdrawal_in_2.html<http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102868110000&s=67263&e=001iaIfhf3vm0HOJlW9eXpEiJl52RwxslV231UnjCYFJdr64WibclX--3xbQvybcGcDSLUMbkJTrkonOgtTmFMZnGK71Bh0H9yPoE3RLxAaJzToA-tw0SAydSpgV2lJRcwAwNZ9XilGHVJwCI3GvilptrKO3RDPkOfFWliXriVKmNj66TQK8xXmGflbEqKlrLqIg6QIcPkjdNzKbljWup9OWlqZh5kujixb>

 ===

 *Obama's speech on Afghanistan: A compendium of lies: *

 In his December 1 speech at West Point announcing the deployment of 30,000
more US troops to Afghanistan, President Barack Obama attempted to justify a
major escalation of a deeply unpopular war on the basis of lies and
distortions. That he had to resort to such falsifications reflects both the
reactionary character of his policy and the fact that it is being imposed in
violation of the popular will.

 http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/dec2009/pers-d03.shtml<http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102868110000&s=67263&e=001iaIfhf3vm0HvaE5bBMDkpIkQRpj-et-3YnZhgxmJwCPvCwxi1deV_JbVCWNTUP-lf9zVCGzA8ZhIxqLFscMdJZt4BxXA0qTanhFOcpZ2VJoN6bAGdeHnityX7h-o9_6PE8wgEKiZKDsLCIDfjRywEwvIugNiFpvvt5sPIwYJSEg=>

 ===

 *Travelling by road in Afghanistan 'now more dangerous than under Taliban':

*

 Britain's most senior commander in Helmand has admitted.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/defence/6718217/Travelling-by-road-in-Afghanistan-now-more-dangerous-than-under-Taliban.html<http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102868110000&s=67263&e=001iaIfhf3vm0GyC-C7mlYTHNwnHkC-Ih5BI4TAsP-Mvqb25GpJmA0Jdc6lzIeGRoMdmdJPzI5-z0CMRFdDgLwJ0fnbExai94H44CwdZjblBbAJHEwLgBELG1o6Mkd1fGloVH6XWY5wkfCS3mVaVgtEKlrqCr6Ckcq4zQPEQa9kKKRg9iK702p9n7Q0jB-OR-bVElsn6JqPP-ZJ2yNfwFYc2Bfr30g7yg91-k_J2E-I-bRuNcsU6cf2JtDsT0E_e8mvDAKgOm0sp2yvTd8x1AAWTUxEN1

----- Message truncated -----

--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited.blogspot.com/