From: "rkurian1@vsnl.com" <rkurian1@vsnl.com>
To: india-unity@yahoogroups.com; indiathinkersnet@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 22:21:18
Subject: [india-unity] Anand Patwardhan on Binayak Sen..
An article by Anand Patwardhan on Binayak Sen on the edit page of the TOI today:
http://timesofindia .indiatimes. com/articleshow/ 4455901.cms
S U B V E R S E
Prisoner of conscience
Anand Patwardhan
May 14 this year will mark an ignominious date for Indian democracy - the
start of the third straight year of Binayak Sen's incarceration in a
Chhattisgarh jail. I wonder if there are words left to describe this
travesty. What is left to say that has not been said? On Binayak's
behalf,writers, poets, judges, lawyers, doctors, human rights workers and
trade unionists have spoken out from across India and the globe. Former
Supreme Court justice Krishna Iyer, former US attorney general Ramsey Clark,
Noam Chomsky and 22 Nobel laureates are amongst the thousands who grace this
impressive list, but so far it has all been to no avail.
For those who may not recall, let me set out a chronology. Binayak is a
paeditrician, a gold medallist who eschewed a lucrative urban practice to
work amongst the poorest in central India. When i met him in the mid-1980s
he had helped build a workers' hospital for the Chhattisgarh Mines Workers'
Samiti led by the legendary Shankar Guha Niyogi. Niyogi and his team were
not ordinary trade unionists but visionaries for whom a workers' union went
beyond wage struggles - to health care, education, even cinema literacy and,
of course, fighting the scourge of alcoholism that inevitably afflicts the
unorganised. Niyogi was murdered in 1991. The liquor mafia was blamed but it
is commonly understood that they were merely the medium and that the real
killers were politicians aligned to industrialists for whom a union that
could not be co-opted had to be crushed.
Niyogi's murder was followed by widespread repression. As big money
entered the mineral-rich region, Adivasis found themselves displaced from
their lands. A section joined the Naxalite movement, which in turn spawned
greater repression. Binayak continued his medical work but also began to
document human rights violations in his capacity as secretary of the
Peoples' Union for Civil Liberties, an organisation founded by Jayaprakash
Narayan in 1977. More specifically he wrote against the Salwa Judum
operation, through which the state armed and trained local Adivasis as a
vigilante militia to fight other Adivasis who had joined the Naxalites,
resulting in a brutal civil war.
On a visit to jail, Binayak came across an ailing elderly man, Narayan
Sanyal, and began medically treating him. Later this became the trigger for
his persecution. Binayak was suddenly accused of carrying letters to and
from Sanyal, who was accused of being a Naxalite, even though each jail
visit was made under strict scrutiny. Binayak was in Kolkata when he learned
about the warrant for his arrest. He insisted on travelling back to
Chhattisgarh to clear his name, which is certainly not an act of a guilty
man. But guilty or not, two precious years have been snatched from him, just
as surely as he was snatched from the marginalised people he so dedicatedly
served.
Meanwhile the official case against Binayak is falling apart. Of the 83
listed prosecution witnesses, 16 were dropped and six declared hostile by
the prosecutors themselves, while 61 others have deposed without
corroborating any of the accusations against him. Why is this man still in
jail and denied bail? Is it because no one dares admit he was innocent to
start with?
On March 16 this year, a group of 50 satyagrahis from across India
marched to the central jail in Raipur, demanding Binayak's release. We were
arrested and set free. The following week a second batch of satyagrahis did
the same. This action has been taken each Monday for almost two months now.
What more can we do? How much louder can we shout?
But shout we must. At Binayak's trial we learned he is suffering from
heart disease. A court-appointed doctor recommended that he be shifted to
Vellore for a possible angioplasty or bypass. An RTI query has shockingly
revealed a month later that the police are unconstitutionally insisting that
Binayak be treated in Chhattisgarh. Should Binayak, who lost his liberty to
an arbitrary state, be forced to trust the same agency with his life? India
is a signatory to the International Human Rights Covenant. By definition its
human rights activists must be protected. It is our democracy that is on
trial.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment