palashcbiswas,
gostokanan, sodepur, kolkata-700110 phone:033-25659551
From: Cort Greene <cort.greene@gmail.com>
To: Miami_PeaceandJustice_Activists@yahoogroups.com; mecawi@yahoogroups.com; Tidewater_Progressives <Tidewater_Progressives@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: nova-peace-discuss <nova-peace-discuss@yahoogroups.com>; no_iraq_war_az@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 9 May, 2009 19:43:48
Subject: [no_iraq_war_az] Mexican NGOs, Brigadier General, Unite in Letter Against Plan Mexico
Mexican NGOs, Brigadier General, Unite in Letter Against Plan Mexico Human
Rights Organizations Break from Amnesty International's 2008 Pro-Merida
Initiative Letter
By Kristin Bricker
Special to The Narco News Bulletin
May 7, 2009
Yesterday, 72 Mexican civil society organizations and a Brigadier General of
the Mexican Army sent the following letter to US Congress demanding that all
military aid to Mexico be immediately halted. The letter comes as the US House
of Representative is considering more than doubling 2009
funding<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/kristin-bricker/2009/05/us-congress-seeks-double-2009-funding-mexico-drug-war>for
the war on drugs in Mexico.
Human rights organizations from Mexico City and 21 of Mexico's 31 states
signed the letter.
The signatories express their serious concern that Mexican President Felipe
Calderon seeks to further militarize Mexican society. They write, "President
Felipe Calderón has introduced a package of proposed legislative reforms to
our Congress which contemplate declaring states of emergency that would
justify the takeover and control of the Mexican Army over civilian
institutions…"
The signatories tell Congress, "The number of complaints for human rights
violations committed by members of the armed forces registered by the
National Human Rights Commission has increased six-fold during the last two
years, reaching 1,230 in 2008." They note that human rights crimes committed
by soldiers are almost never punished: "There is an almost complete absence
of transparency in cases of human rights violations committed by soldiers,
due to the use of military jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute members
of the armed forces responsible for such actions… To date we have no
knowledge of any conviction or sentence in a case of human rights violations
committed by the armed forces during the current presidential
administration."
Given the sharp increase in human rights abuses and the blanket impunity the
military enjoys, the signatories write: "We respectfully request that the
U.S. Congress and Department of State, in both the Merida Initiative as in
other programs to support public security in Mexico, does not allocate funds
or direct programs to the armed forces…. In particular, we urge the United
States to consider ways to support a holistic response to security problems;
based on tackling the root causes of violence and ensuring the full respect
of human rights; not on the logic of combat."
The letter marks a sharp divergence from an NGO letter drafted by Amnesty
International and signed by many of the same signatories in May 2008. That
letter, while expressing "profound concern over the human rights violations
that have occurred in the last several months by the Mexican military and
police within the context of the federal government's fight against
drug-trafficking and organized crime," did not take a clear stance against
the Merida Initiative and other US military aid to Mexico. On the contrary,
it said, "We consider US cooperation on security matters to be appropriate
and timely…" The letter merely requested that human rights provisions be
included in the Merida Initiative. Said human rights conditions apply to
less than 15% of the total Merida Initiative package, and US Congress is
currently considering doubling drug war aid to Mexico in 2009 even though
the human rights conditions have not been met.
Amnesty International's Mexico office told Narco News that they did not sign
the following letter because they are still waiting for the Mexican
government to comply with the human rights conditions they supported in last
year's letter.
With today's statement, Mexican civil society and human rights
organizations—based on their own lived experience with the consequences of
Plan Mexico—have broken from the path of compromise urged on them last year
by Amnesty, an organization that remains with a strategy now widely rejected
South of the Border.
------------------------------
May 6, 2009
To: The Honorable Congress of the United States of America
Hon. Patrick Leahy, Chairman, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and
Related Programs
Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate
Hon. Nita M. Lowey, Chair, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and
Related Programs
Committee on Appropriations
United States House of Representatives
Hon. Judd Greg, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations,
and Related Programs
Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate
Hon. Kay Granger, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations
and Related Programs
Committee on Appropriations
United States House of Representatives
Honorable Members of Congress:
The signatory organizations listed below address you, honorable
representatives of the Congress of the United States of America, following
President Barack Obama's visit to Mexico on April 16 and 17, as well as the
visits by high level public officials from the Obama administration in
previous weeks; all of which represent a significant step forward in
relations between our countries. In particular, in this letter we outline
our concrete concerns regarding military assistance from the United States
to Mexico.
We have closely monitored the impact of public security policies implemented
by the current presidential administrations in both Mexico and the United
States as well as bilateral assistance in this area. In this respect we make
special mention of recent statements, such as those made by Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton, in which high level officials of the President Obama
administration have recognized the United States' responsibility in the
problem of drug trafficking- related violence in Mexico owing to factors
such as the high demand for drugs in the United States.
Furthermore, we welcome recent comments by the Secretary for Homeland
Security, Janet Napolitano, which affirm that strengthening civil
institutions, not increasing militarization, is the answer to combating high
levels of violence along the United States-Mexico border. We hope that this
perspective is shared by the U.S. Congress when determining how to allocate
funds for public security and to support Mexico.
We wish to emphasize the current reality in Mexico where President Felipe
Calderón has introduced a package of proposed legislative reforms to our
Congress which contemplate declaring states of emergency that would justify
the takeover and control of the Mexican Army over civilian institutions when
these are considered inadequate or inefficient and when such a measure is
considered strategic for national security. These proposed reforms are
concerning because of the abuses that can arise from the militarization of
public security.
Taking this into account, we express our serious concerns and reservations
regarding the military aid provided by the United States to Mexico. Instead,
we urge for an approach that is more comprehensive and respectful of the
human and civil rights of the Mexican population.
We take this opportunity to highlight the following points:
• Through the Merida Initiative, the U.S. Congress has approved the
expenditure of 700 million dollars directed to Mexico during its first two
years. The package includes a significant portion of foreign military
financing; especially in the first year of funding.
• In 2008, the United States Department of Defense stated that it had
designated almost 13 million dollars in assistance to Mexico under Section
1206 to strengthen the capacity of Mexican armed forces to carry out
anti-terrorist operations.
• Recent statements by the Obama Administration and congressional leaders
indicate that Congress will soon be contemplating sizeable increases in
funding for "the war against drugs" in Mexico as part of the FY09
Appropriations
Supplemental Request, including $350 million dollars for the Department of
Defense for anti-drug operations and other security-related activities on
the United States-Mexico border and over $400 million dollars in assistance
for counternarcotics efforts in Mexico that will be channeled through the
Department of State. We are concerned about the lack of clear information on
the specific designation of these funds and the possibility that they will
be utilized to support further military assistance inside Mexico or
militarization of the border region.
• Funding for the Merida Initiative in the 2010 budget will soon be under
discussion.
In light of the previous points, it is critical to contextualize the
problems implicit in foreign military funding in the current circumstances
in Mexico:
• The deployment of the Mexican Army to carry out public security tasks that
legally correspond to the civilian police has brought with it a significant
increase in human rights violations in the last two years, including
extrajudicial executions, torture, arbitrary detentions and rape. In fact,
the number of complaints for human rights violations committed by members of
the armed forces registered by the National Human Rights Commission has
increased six-fold during the last two years, reaching 1,230 in 20081.
• This situation owes itself in large part to considerations such as:
o The Army is not trained to carry out tasks that legally correspond to
civilian institutions. On the contrary, the mentality of the armed forces is
to confront an enemy force and not to protect the rights of the civilian
population in the context of normal policing tasks.
o There is an almost complete absence of transparency in cases of human
rights violations committed by soldiers, due to the use of military
jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute members of the armed forces
responsible for such actions. According to information obtained through
freedom of information mechanisms, in the first two years of the
presidential term of Felipe Calderón, military authorities opened 170
investigations under military jurisdiction in which the victims were
civilians; in this same period only 10 of these investigations resulted in
indictments. To date we have no knowledge of any conviction or sentence in a
case of human rights violations committed by the armed forces during the
current presidential administration.
The involvement of the armed forces in policing tasks is not an effective
response to combat drug trafficking and violence associated with organized
crime. Military presence can at times result in an increase in the number of
arrests; however, as an overall strategy it has not proven to be effective
as it fails to address the factors that cause and perpetuate violence. An
approach that takes the social factors that contribute to crime into account
is urgently needed; instead of attacking crime with short-term approaches
that respond only to situational contingencies.
We respectfully request that the U.S. Congress and Department of State, in
both the Merida Initiative as in other programs to support public security
in Mexico, does not allocate funds or direct programs to the armed forces.
We believe that a change of paradigm is needed in order to combat the
factors that cause drug trafficking and violence; instead of only combating
their symptoms.
Any response to violence caused by drug trafficking must include measures
to:
• Improve the access to drug treatment in the United States and implement
other measures to reduce the demand for drugs in both countries.
• Reduce the flow of arms from the United States to Mexico.
• In terms of the possibility of providing funds to Mexico to improve the
public security situation, any funding considered should take into account:
o Programs that address the root causes of insecurity such as poverty,
inequality and the lack of access to educational and employment
opportunities that allow the population to live a life of dignity.
o The strengthening of civil institutions, with civil and not military
control; including the positive aspects of the judicial reform in Mexico
such as the implementation of oral trials and an adversarial justice system.
Given the current considerations for the Merida Initiative 2010 budget and
the possibility of more military financing to Mexico being channeled through
the Department of Defense, we hope that the U.S. government takes into
account the concerns and suggestions outlined in this letter in order to
re-design assistance programs to Mexico. In particular, we urge the United
States to consider ways to support a holistic response to security problems;
based on tackling the root causes of violence and ensuring the full respect
of human rights; not on the logic of combat.
*Signatory organizations* (all Mexican non-governmental human rights
organizations):
The National Network of Human Rights Civil Organizations "Todos los Derechos
para Todas y Todos"
Agenda LGBT
Asistencia Legal por los Derechos Humanos, A.C. (Distrito Federal)
Asociación Jalisciense de Apoyo a los Grupos Indígenas, A.C. (Guadalajara,
Jalisco)
Asociación para la Defensa de los Derechos Ciudadanos "Miguel Hidalgo", A.C.
(Jacala, Hidalgo)
Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir, A.C. (Distrito Federal)
Centro "Fray Julián Garcés" Derechos Humanos y Desarrollo Local, A. C.
(Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala)
Centro de Apoyo al Trabajador, A.C. (Puebla, Puebla)
Centro de Derechos Humanos "Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas", A. C. (San
Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas)
Centro de Derechos Humanos "Fray Francisco de Vitoria O.P.", A. C. (CDHFV)
(Distrito Federal)
Centro de Derechos Humanos "Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez", A. C. (PRODH)
(Distrito Federal)
Centro de Derechos Humanos "Don Sergio" (Jiutepec, Morelos)
Centro de Derechos Humanos "Fray Matías de Córdova". A.C. (Tapachula,
Chiapas)
Centro de Derechos Humanos de la Montaña, Tlachinollan, A. C. (Tlapa,
Guerrero)
Centro de Derechos Humanos de las Mujeres, A.C. (Chihuahua)
Centro de Derechos Humanos, "Juan Gerardi", A. C. (Torreón, Coahuila)
Centro de Derechos Humanos Ñu'u Ji Kandií, A. C. (Tlaxiaco, Oaxaca)
Centro de Derechos Humanos Paso del Norte (Cd. Juárez)
Centro de Derechos Humanos Solidaridad Popular, A.C. (Monterrey, Nuevo Leon)
Centro de Derechos Humanos Tepeyac del Istmo de Tehuantepec, A. C.
(Tehuantepec, Oaxaca)
Centro de Derechos Humanos Victoria Diez, A.C. (León, Guanajuato)
Centro de Derechos Indígenas "Flor y Canto", A. C. (Oaxaca, Oaxaca)
Centro de Derechos Indígenas A. C. (Bachajón, Chiapas)
Centro de Estudios Fronterizos y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos, A. C.
(Reynosa, Tamaulipas)
Centro de Justicia para la Paz y el Desarrollo, A. C. (CEPAD) (Guadalajara,
Jalisco)
Centro de Reflexión y Acción Laboral (CEREAL-DF) (Distrito Federal)
Centro de Reflexión y Acción Laboral (CEREAL-Guadalajara) (Guadalajara,
Jalisco)
Centro Diocesano para los Derechos Humanos "Fray Juan de Larios",A.C.
(Saltillo, Coahuila)
Centro Hermanas Mirabal de Derechos Humanos (León, Guanajuato)
Centro Mujeres (La Paz, Baja California)
Centro Regional de Defensa de DDHH José María Morelos y Pavón, A. C.
(Chilapa, Guerrero)
Centro Regional de Derechos Humanos "Bartolomé Carrasco", A. C. (Oaxaca,
Oaxaca)
Ciencia Social Alternativa, A.C. – KOOKAY (Mérida, Yucatan)
Ciudadanía Lagunera por los Derechos Humanos, A. C. (CILADHAC) (Torreón,
Coahuila)
Ciudadanos en Apoyo a los Derechos Humanos, A. C. (CADHAC) (Monterrey, Nuevo
Leon)
Colectivo Educación para la Paz y los Derechos Humanos, A.C. (CEPAZDH) (San
Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas)
Colectivo contra la Tortura (Distrito Federal)
Comisión de Derechos Humanos "La Voz de los sin voz" (Coyuca de Benítez,
Guerrero)
Comisión de Derechos Humanos y Laborales del Valle de Tehuacan, A.C.
(Tehuacan, Puebla.)
Comisión de Solidaridad y Defensa de los Derechos Humanos, A. C. (Chihuahua,
Chihuahua)
Comisión Independiente de Derechos Humanos de Morelos, A. C. (CIDHMOR)
(Cuernavaca, Morelos)
Comisión Intercongregacional "Justicia, Paz y Vida" (Distrito Federal)
Comisión Parroquial de Derechos Humanos "Martín de Tours", A.C. (Texmelucan,
Puebla)
Comisión Regional de Derechos Humanos "Mahatma Gandhi", A. C. (Tuxtepec,
Oaxaca)
Comité de Defensa de las Libertades Indígenas (CDLI) (Palenque, Chiapas)
Comité de Derechos Humanos Ajusco (Distrito Federal)
Comité de Derechos Humanos "Fr. Pedro Lorenzo de la Nada", A. C. (Ocosingo,
Chiapas)
Comité de Derechos Humanos "Sembrador de la Esperanza". A. C. (Acapulco,
Guerrero)
Comité de Derechos Humanos "Sierra Norte de Veracruz", AC. (Huayacocotla,
Verarcruz)
Comité de Derechos Humanos de Colima, No gubernamental, A. C. (Colima,
Colima)
Comité de Derechos Humanos de Comalcalco, A. C. (CODEHUCO) (Comalcalco,
Tabasco)
Comité de Derechos Humanos de Tabasco, A. C. (CODEHUTAB) (Villahermosa,
Tabasco)
Comité de Derechos Humanos y Orientación Miguel Hidalgo, A. C. (Dolores
Hidalgo, Guanajuato)
Comité Sergio Méndez Arceo Pro Derechos Humanos de Tulancingo, Hgo AC
(Tulancingo,
Hidalgo)
Frente Cívico Sinaloense. Secretaría de Derechos Humanos. (Culiacán,
Sinaloa)
Indignación, A. C. Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos Humanos (Chablekal,
comisaría del municipio de Mérida,
Yucatan)
Instituto Guerrerense de Derechos Humanos, A. C. (Chilpancingo, Guerrero)
Instituto Mexicano para el Desarrollo Comunitario, A. C. (IMDEC),
(Guadalajara, Jalisco)
Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente, – Programa
Institucional de Derechos Humanos y Paz.
(Guadalajara, Jalisco)
Programa de Derechos Humanos. Universidad Iberoamericana-Puebla (Puebla,
Puebla)
Programa Universitario de Derechos Humanos. UIA –León (León, Guanajuato)
Proyecto de Derechos Económicos, Sociales Y Culturales (PRODESC) (Distrito
Federal)
Respuesta Alternativa, A. C. Servicio de Derechos Humanos y Desarrollo
Comunitario (San Luis Potosí)
Servicio, Paz y Justicia de Tabasco, A.C. (Villahermosa, Tabasco)
Servicio, Paz y Justicia, México (SERPAJ-México) (Comalcalco, Tabasco)
Taller Universitario de Derechos Humanos, A. C. (TUDH) (Distrito Federal)
Red Guerrerense de Organizaciones Civiles de Derechos Humanos: Network of
Civil human Rights organizations of
Guerrero
Other signatory organizations:
Otros Mundos, AC/Campaña por la Desmilitarización de las Américas (CADA)
Red Mesa de Mujeres de Ciudad Juárez
Mujeres por México en Chihuahua, A. C
Instituto Mexicano de Derechos Humanos y Democracia A.C. (The Mexican
Institute for Human Rights and
Democracy)
La Red Mexicana de Accion frente al Libre Comercio (RMALC)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/no_iraq_war_az/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/no_iraq_war_az/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:no_iraq_war_az-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:no_iraq_war_az-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
no_iraq_war_az-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment