Are You Ready For Nuclear War?

Are You Ready For Nuclear War?

By Paul Craig Roberts

Pervez Musharraf, the puppet installed by the US to rule Pakistan in
the interest of US hegemony, resigned August 18 to avoid impeachment.
Karl Rove and the Diebold electronic voting machines were unable to
control the result of the last election in Pakistan, the result of
which gave Pakistanis a bigger voice in their government than America's.

It was obvious to anyone with any sense—which excludes the entire Bush
Regime and almost all of the "foreign policy community"—that the
illegal and gratuitous US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and
Israel's 2006 bombing of Lebanon civilians with US blessing, would
result in the overthrow of America's Pakistani puppet.

The imbecilic Bush Regime ensured Musharraf's overthrow by pressuring
their puppet to conduct military operations against tribesmen in
Pakistani border areas, whose loyalties were to fellow Muslims and not
to American hegemony. When Musharraf's military operations didn't
produce the desired result, the idiotic Americans began conducting
their own military operations within Pakistan with bombs and missiles.
This finished off Musharraf.

When the Bush Regime began its wars in the Middle East, I predicted,
correctly, that Musharraf would be one victim. The American puppets in
Egypt and Jordan may be the next to go.

Back during the Nixon years, my Ph.D. dissertation chairman, Warren
Nutter, was Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security
Affairs. One day in his Pentagon office I asked him how the US
government got foreign governments to do what the US wanted. "Money,"
he replied.

"You mean foreign aid?" I asked.

"No," he replied, "we just buy the leaders with money."

It wasn't a policy he had implemented. He inherited it and, although
the policy rankled with him, he could do nothing about it. Nutter
believed in persuasion and that if you could not persuade people, you
did not have a policy.

Nutter did not mean merely third world potentates were bought. He
meant the leaders of England, France, Germany, Italy, all the allies
everywhere were bought and paid for.

They were allies because they were paid. Consider Tony Blair. Blair's
own head of British intelligence told him that the Americans were
fabricating the evidence to justify their already planned attack on
Iraq. This was fine with Blair, and you can see why with his multi-
million dollar payoff once he was out of office.

The American-educated thug, Saakashkvili the War Criminal, who is
president of Georgia, was installed by the US taxpayer funded National
Endowment for Democracy, a neocon operation whose purpose is to ring
Russia with US military bases, so that America can exert hegemony over
Russia.

Every agreement that President Reagan made with Mikhail Gorbachev has
been broken by Reagan's successors. Reagan's was the last American
government whose foreign policy was not made by the Israeli-allied
neoconservatives. During the Reagan years, the neocons made several
runs at it, but each ended in disaster for Reagan, and he eventually
drove the modern day French Jacobins from his government.

Even the anti-Soviet Committee on the Present Danger regarded the
neocons as dangerous lunatics. I remember the meeting when a member
tried to bring the neocons into the committee, and old line American
establishment representatives, such as former Treasury Secretary
Douglas Dillon, hit the roof.

The Committee on the Present Danger regarded the neocons as crazy
people who would get America into a nuclear war with the Soviet Union.
The neocons hated President Reagan, because he ended the cold war with
diplomacy, when they desired a military victory over the Soviet Union.

Deprived of this, the neocons now want victory over Russia.

Today, Reagan is gone. The Republican Establishment is gone. There are
no conservative power centers, only neoconservative power centers
closely allied with Israel, which uses the billions of dollars
funneled into Israeli coffers by US taxpayers to influence US
elections and foreign policy.

The Republican candidate for president is a warmonger. There are no
checks remaining in the Republican Party on the neocons' proclivity
for war. What Republican constituencies oppose war? Can anyone name one?

The Democrats are not much better, but they have some constituencies
that are not enamored of war in order to establish US world hegemony.
The Rapture Evangelicals, who fervently desire Armageddon, are not
Democrats; nor are the brainwashed Brownshirts desperate to vent their
frustrations by striking at someone, somewhere, anywhere.

I get emails from these Brownshirts and attest that their hate-filled
ignorance is extraordinary. They are all Republicans, and yet they
think they are conservatives. They have no idea who I am, but since I
criticize the Bush Regime and America's belligerent foreign policy,
they think I am a "liberal commie pinko."

The only literate sentence this legion of imbeciles has ever managed
is: "If you hate America so much, why don't you move to Cuba!"

Such is the current state of a Reagan political appointee in today's
Republican Party. He is a "liberal commie pinko" who should move to Cuba.

The Republicans will get us into more wars. Indeed, they live for war.
McCain is preaching war for 100 years. For these warmongers, it is
like cheering for your home team. Win at all costs. They get a
vicarious pleasure out of war. If the US has to tell lies in order to
attack countries, what's wrong with that? "If we don't kill them over
there, they will kill us over here."

The mindlessness is total.

Nothing real issues from the American media. The media is about
demonizing Russia and Iran, about the vice presidential choices as if
it matters, about whether Obama being on vacation let McCain score too
many points.

The mindlessness of the news reflects the mindlessness of the
government, for which it is a spokesperson.

The American media does not serve American democracy or American
interests. It serves the few people who exercise power.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, the US and Israel made a run at
controlling Russia and the former constituent parts of its empire. For
awhile the US and Israel succeeded, but Putin put a stop to it.

Recognizing that the US had no intention of keeping any of the
agreements it had made with Gorbachev, Putin directed the Russian
military budget to upgrading the Russian nuclear deterrent.
Consequently, the Russian army and air force lack the smart weapons
and electronics of the US military.

When the Russian army went into Georgia to rescue the Russians in
South Ossetia from the destruction being inflicted upon them by the
American puppet Saakashvili, the Russians made it clear that if they
were opposed by American troops with smart weapons, they would deal
with the threat with tactical nuclear weapons.

The Americans were the first to announce preemptive nuclear attack as
their permissible war doctrine. Now the Russians have announced the
tactical use of nuclear weapons as their response to American smart
weapons.

It is obvious that American foreign policy, with is goal of ringing
Russia with US military bases, is leading directly to nuclear war.
Every American needs to realize this fact. The US government's insane
hegemonic foreign policy is a direct threat to life on the planet.

Russia has made no threats against America. The post-Soviet Russian
government has sought to cooperate with the US and Europe. Russia has
made it clear over and over that it is prepared to obey international
law and treaties. It is the Americans who have thrown international
law and treaties into the trash can, not the Russians.

In order to keep the billions of dollars in profits flowing to its
contributors in the US military-security complex, the Bush Regime has
rekindled the cold war. As American living standards decline and the
prospects for university graduates deteriorate, "our" leaders in
Washington commit us to a hundred years of war.

If you desire to be poor, oppressed, and eventually vaporized in a
nuclear war, vote Republican.

http://vdare.com/roberts/080818_you.htm